Critical Care Providers' Moral Distress: Frequency, Burden, and Potential Resources.

BACKGROUND: Critical Care Providers (CCPs) experience situations that challenge their ethics and professional standards and may entail moral distress (MD). AIM: To analyze MD perceived by CCPs in intensive care units (ICUs) or emergency departments (EDs) and further clarify whether CCPs who rely on spiritual resources differ in their perception of MD from those who do not utilize these resources. METHODS: A cross-sectional anonymous survey was administered using a modified version of the German language version of the Moral Distress Scale (MDS) with 2 × 12 items to assess the frequency and the respective perceived burden of specific situations by applying a 5-point Likert scale. Explorative factor analysis was performed and the sub-constructs of the respective items regarding MD frequency and burden were identified. Job burden and professional satisfaction were measured using visual analogue scales (VAS) and a four-point Likert scale, respectively. The 15-item SpREUK questionnaire was applied to measure spiritual attitudes and behaviours and to differentiate between religious and spiritual persons. Data from 385 German-speaking CCPs were included (55% physicians, 45% nurses). RESULTS: Conflict situations are similar for physicians and nurses although they are perceived as more burdensome by nurses. Among physicians, the MDS factor Looking away/Resignation scores highest for assistant physician residents, whereas distress caused by looking away is more often perceived by specialist physicians without a managerial position. Work satisfaction is inversely associated with MD and emotional exhaustion is positively associated with it. Participants' spirituality is marginally associated with MD. The best predictors of both MD frequency and burden are emotional exhaustion with further influences of work satisfaction, being a nurse, and being a non-believer on the frequency of MD perception. Being a nurse, participants' experience in ICU/ED, and being of the male gender are further predictors of MD burden. CONCLUSIONS: MD is experienced differently by different groups of CCPs depending on their place in the hierarchy of responsibility. As MD perception is best predicted by emotional exhaustion, these situations should be avoided. Although some CCPs may rely on spiritual resources, all need individual and team support to cope with MD.

Influence of spirituality on moral distress and resilience in critical care staff: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: The Covid 19 pandemic has created a situation in which critical care staff experience moral distress. For reducing moral distress, resources such as spirituality can be used. The aim of this scoping review is to explore whether spirituality mitigates the moral distress of critical care staff and strengthens their resilience. The spiritual resources will be identified and the ability of the staff to use spiritual resources will be explored. METHODOLOGY: A scoping review of studies reporting on the association between spirituality, moral distress, and resilience. Qualitative and quantitative studies from 2020 that examined critical care staff are included. This scoping review used the five-step framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework for scoping reviews. The literature searches were conducted in 12 databases. RESULTS: 13 studies met inclusion criteria. Critical care staff declaring themselves as spiritual have a higher risk of moral distress and are often not able to use spiritual resources on their own. For effective use of spiritual resources to reduce moral distress, staff need to be skilled in the practice of spirituality with the aim to find inner peace, focus on the positive, and regain a sense of purpose in the work. CONCLUSION: Spirituality does not automatically help the critical care staff to cope with moral distress and strengthen resilience. Institutions need to create conditions in which the critical care staff are supported to use their spiritual resources. IMPLICATION FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Institutions need to involve staff more in the design, implementation, and delivery of spiritual interventions to minimise moral distress. Further research is necessary to examine the impact of critical care staff's demographic characteristics on their spirituality, moral distress, and resilience.

Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The prone position (PP) is increasingly used in mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, studies investigating the influence of the PP are currently lacking in these patients. This is the first study to investigate the influence of the PP on the oxygenation and decarboxylation in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: A prospective bicentric study design was used, and in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, PP was indicated from a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) ratio of <200. Patients were left prone for 16 h each. Pressure levels, FIO2, were adjusted to ensure a PaO2 greater than 60 mmHg. Blood gas analyses were performed before (baseline 0.5 h), during (1/2/5.5/9.5/13 h), and after being in the PP (1 h), the circulatory/ventilation parameters were continuously monitored, and lung compliance (LC) was roughly calculated. Responders were defined compared to the baseline value (PaO2/FIO2 ratio increase of ≥15%; partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) decrease of ≥2%). RESULTS: 13 patients were included and 36 PP sessions were conducted. Overall, PaO2/FIO2 increased significantly in the PP (p < 0.001). Most PaO2/FIO2 responders (29/36 PP sessions, 77%) were identified 9.5 h after turning prone (14% slow responders), while most PaCO2 responders (15/36 PP sessions, 42%) were identified 13 h after turning prone. A subgroup of patients (interval intubation to PP ≥3 days) showed less PaO2/FIO2 responders (16% vs. 77%). An increase in PaCO2 and minute ventilation in the PP showed a significant negative correlation (p < 0.001). LC (median before the PP = 38 mL/cm H2O; two patients with LC >80 mL/cm H2O) showed a significant positive correlation with the 28 day survival of patients (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The PP significantly improves oxygenation in COVID-19 ARDS patients. The data suggest that they also benefit most from an early PP. A decrease in minute ventilation may result in fewer PaCO2 responders. LC may be a predictive outcome parameter in COVID-19 patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.